Subject: Перевожу контракт - с русского на англ. слово преемник как можно перевести? gen.
|
|
link 22.06.2016 10:53 |
DUPLESSIS, I’m gonna try to explain those levels. First of all, I think there are no tests to assess language at a very high level. You can assess only grammar, spelling and quality of speech, and that’s it. But our modern language is all about technical words and idioms whether we like it or not. We learn all that stuff in schools and universities. It’s at least 50% of the language. Nobody tests or assesses it. They assess only our knowledge of various subjects (history, chemistry, economics, business law etc.). Having received a good university education, I additionally studied a lot, and definitely know Russian better than an average well-educated guy. I specifically delved into Russian on my own to enhance my knowledge, though it, of course, was not needed anywhere except for proofreaders, journalists etc., but I don’t work in that field. Truth be told, I had some arguments with them, calling into question the quality of their work. As to my scale: I’d say the theoretical maximum is around 12.0: Most people with a good university education should be in the ballpark of 10.0 in my opinion. Someone truly exceptional can be around 11.0, but I’m not that good. Simply put, 17 or more years of education in some language (11 at school + 6 at university) = around level 10.0, provided you were a very good student. So, if you had studied in a Russian school and at a Russian university for 17 years and had been getting good grades, then, DUPLESSIS, you are automatically at level 10.0 or higher. What about 9.0? I guess if you can translate simultaneously (after some training, of course) into some language, then that language is at level 9.0. For that you need around 10 years of education in that language (or in that country), but 17 years would be overkill in my opinion. What about level 8? Well, that’s when you are exceptionally good at simultaneous interpreting (level B). It’s higher than C2, Proficiency. Level 7: That’s proficiency, C2. Some claim that C2 is close to native speakers. Yes, if a native speaker is a household speaker. Example: a Spanish kid emigrates to the US at age 7 and continues to speak Spanish at home while studying and socializing in English. Well, you may say that his Spanish is C2 when he goes back to Spain, say, after 15 years of living in the US. Well, Spaniards will speak Spanish way better than he does with his pathetic C2 kinda native level (50% of vocabulary will be missing: chemistry, history and all other subjects and much more). C2 is of course the be-all and and-all for foreigners. Even some (household) native speakers are far worse than C2 -- that's a fact. Well, I guess, I'm starting to go off on a tangent (towards linguistics). |
матушки-батюшки, извержение вулкана... DUPLESSIS, ну и что такого в 105 %? на выборах и не такое бывает :-) а вот этот кусочек лавы: "Sentences should start with capital letters. Maybe you should take Russian lessons from a school teacher?" - ай, нехорошо огрызаться! я тоже на форуме со строчной буквы предложения начинаю - фишка у меня такая, как и у Tante B и ещё у многих здесь, делов-то |
|
link 22.06.2016 11:28 |
Erdferkel, I have no beef with you. That is just my opinion about the Russian of Tante. I ain't said a single bad word about him/her. I'm simply entitled to have my personal opinion, which is the Russian of that person is at the borderline level. Just my personal opinion. Not polite is to use words огрызаться, screw... etc. Again, I have no beef with you. And I ain't saying anything about your Russian. I don't know it; maybe your Russian is exceptionally good. This letter was an answer to the question of DUPLESSIS. Take care PS: (quote from my previous post: "I sometimes show to those snobs who learned a tad of prim and proper Russian their place. Drawing on my expertise, I can annihilate their shallow knowledge by picking holes here and there, poking fun at either their poor Russian vocabulary, or punctuation, or something else") |
Clear?? Not in the least, old chap. Before I read past "the theoretical maximum is around 12.0", tell me this: Exactly who set this "theoretical max"? You? (Btw, you could have passed on on seven levels. It's about over-Level 7 we are on about. I happen to have heard of them. ;-) Also, you could have passed on the constituent scores. It's the overall assessment of proficiency, not an arithmetical sum of vocab or grammar performance counts.) Honest Injun, man, cross my heart and hope to die, I'm NOT trolling you. I am missing something. Erdferkel, mein Blumelei, das ist keine Wahlen. Тут какбэ... другоэ. |
|
link 22.06.2016 11:41 |
C/O DUPLESSIS One more comment. As I said before there are no tests for complex scientific analysis of very high native language levels, but the main vocabulary can be tested (it'll be only 50% with the other 50% being writing skills, listening comprehension, idioms, speech, science and technology related vocabulary). The main vocabulary can be tested here: www.m-w.com |
Who set the max сount at 12.0? Why at 12.0? Thank you. |
|
link 22.06.2016 11:52 |
Assume, a very well educated native speaker (17 years of education) is 10.0. Then 12.0 is a projected figure against this 10.0 benchmark. Or would you rather assume the maximum is 15.0? Would you really assume so high a number against a very well ed'd person? If 10.0 is a very well educated native speaker and 5.0 is at upper-intermediate level, do you really think that there can be another native speaker (15.0) who is better than 10.0 by such a sweeping margin (+5.0) as a 10.0 guy is better than a 5.0 guy. Not possible, not a chance. But you can set the max at 13.0 for some genius. That's common sense, man. |
Ru10.5etc, you are excellent. I mean it. Don't be upset with Duplessis. |
PS: И опять вы за это: My Russian sucks in your opinion. Да нет. Don't jump at generalizations, ok? Ну наакосячил. Ну бывает. Спелчекер не увидел. Но обещать не сходя с сместа разграмливать чей-нибудь shallow русский язык после этого некотороое время лучшее не стоит. Имхо. ;-) А вот, скажем, два года в пехотной школе в славном городе Oudtshoorn (сверх одного универа с двумя половинами двух других) тоже можно к language proficiency count прищщетать? В тоей школе стока слов всяких набираются! На 2 языках, между прочим. Чума! (Hо, сказать по правде, в условиях отвратительной связи в боевой обстановке ambilingualism is poison. Проверено.) |
|
link 22.06.2016 12:06 |
Some more explan'n: It should be crystal clear that some C2 level is way way below a 10.0 mark. We set this 10.0 at the level of a very well educated native speaker (17 years of educ'n, probably 25-30 years of living in the country where the said language is spoken). C2 will probably requires 10 years of living in another country, while having some decent IQ (= being not some numskull). |
Ru, man, I did not ask how to count. I asked who counted/counts this way? You? Anyone else? |
|
link 22.06.2016 12:12 |
My opinion about C2: you need at least 5 years to achieve this level. It's about as many words as is in an old En-Ru dict'ry for 20,000 words. Plus idioms, correct grammar, blah, blah. A genius probably can achieve this faster. Normally it should be 10 years of living in the country whose language you study. |
///One more comment./// OMG!! |
|
link 22.06.2016 12:20 |
As I said, it is just common sense. You may shift it two points down, making a 10.0 mark unattainable. Then C2 should be at a 5.0., my Ru at a 8.5, En at a 7.5. Bottom line: there is a huge gap between a "full-fledged comprehensive knowledge of our native tongue" and some C2 of foreigners. |
![]() |
|
link 22.06.2016 12:29 |
Good because I was starting to feel as if I'm gonna be committed. ))) |
Dear Ru. Please. Go on. You are fascinating. I mean it. But for Chrissake, please answer just one question: Who has thought up this count system? You? |
|
link 22.06.2016 12:53 |
Yes. But all I did was setting a 10.0 scale against various levels. It is neither logic, nor common sense to set the max mark at some fantastic far-fetched level of some genius. So, why not just a well educated native speaker? Or why should I stack up my Russian against some foreign C2 level? Assume setting the foreign C2 level to be 10.0. Then what? Should my Russian be 1000.0 or what? That just doesn't add up. Or should I invent some new scale for native speakers? What number should I tie it to? People know such systems as CEFR C1, C2, B2, Level A, B (in interpreting). Why not set against those numbers? So I did. Hence: 1 - a beginner, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 - a well educated native person. Or should a 10 be an astronomical genius? Then the system collapses. You have to divide everything by 2 - that sounds weird and illogical. |
|
link 22.06.2016 12:56 |
Basically, I did nothing at all. I just designated numbers starting from 1, going to 7 (C2), then 8 (level (B)), 9 (level (A)), and finally 10 (well-educated native speaker). Man, I just counted them. That's all. |
|
link 22.06.2016 13:00 |
Simply put, I just used my arithmetic skills. It's that simple. No calculus, no abstract algebra, just arithmetic ))) Just counting from 1 to 10 ))) |
(облегченно вздохнув) Спасибо. Понятно. Поставлю-ка я себе в профиль Ru23.5 и En18.5 (Три года детского сада с его речеразвивающими занятиями я тоже присчитал, есличо. Ачо? Своя рука владыка.) |
|
link 22.06.2016 13:10 |
The best way to go is Ru 100.0 out of 100.0 (where proficiency C2 = 5.0) En 100.0 out of 100.0 (where proficiency C2 = 5.0) )))) |
Ну. Я так и считаю. ;-) |
ой, и я себе щас кааак запузырю чего-нибудь зашкаливающее! русский-то ладно, этот язык без костей, а вот для немецкого даже и не знаю... с шести лет дома занятия, потом школа, потом универ, потом 40 с хвостиком лет в Германии... Ru10.5 En9.5, это сколько поставить-то? :-) |
а я вообще академик -- и то молчу :) |
Скормно промолчу о том, что я атец-основатель обеих языкум. |
вот сколько нас теперь на этом заборе кукарекает! |
|
link 22.06.2016 14:43 |
Yeah, I'll never live down, ha-ha. ))))) |
|
link 22.06.2016 14:53 |
Weird that nobody caterwauls about my English slipups ;) Or doesn't overcorrect what is already correct. Early days. Yeah ))) Rome wasn't built in one day ))) |
это все потому, что еще не вечер. |
///Weird that nobody caterwauls about my English slipups ;) /// You are writing much faster then I can read. |
|
link 22.06.2016 15:06 |
![]() |
|
link 22.06.2016 15:08 |
Sure, man. There are glaring mistypings friendlily awaiting. Visible with the naked eye or in small apertures with low magnification ))) |
"You are writing much faster then I can read." - как у Пушкина: "Vous m’écrivez, mon ange, des lettres de quatre pages plus vite que je ne puis les lire Вы пишете мне, мой ангел, письма по четыре страницы, быстрее, чем я успеваю их прочитать" |
No one wants your balls in the mousetrap, young fella me lad (as I tried to convince you re. приемник - I hope did), особенно теперь - после того, как выяснилось, что систему оценки вы сами cебе нарисовали - читать ваши посты ради сомнительного удовольствия вас еще и за язык пригвоздить. :-) @Erdferkel, gnadige Frau, point taken (and fully appreciated), вы разрешите к Вам обратиться? ;-) |
э? а кто ж Вам запретит? небось не в армии, мы тут наедине со всеми :-) |
No one wants your balls in the mousetrap, young fella me lad (as I tried to convince you re. приемник - I hope did), особенно теперь - после того, как выяснилось, что систему оценки вы сами cебе нарисовали - еще и читать ваши посты ради сомнительного удовольствия вас еще и за язык пригвоздить. :-) @Erdferkel, gnaedige Frau, point taken (and fully appreciated), вы разрешите к Вам обратиться? ;-) |
Ой. Продуплил. Да я таки чел экс-армейский...По панамке и загару видно. Schwarzbraun ist die HaselnuЯ, schwarzbraun bin auch ich, ja ich.. (c) |
ну вот, запели вслед за Печориным :-) |
|
link 22.06.2016 16:19 |
Это реклама |
|
link 22.06.2016 16:24 |
Should I myself start the process of faultfinding? English is out - too many mistakes. Russian? Hmm... What should I start with? Punctuation? Diction faults? Faulty idioms? Пора разгромить чей-нибудь русский язык в пух и прах, подвергнуть низкий культурный уровень безжалостной критике; пора указать кому-нибудь на полное отсутствие культуры речи, на пунктуацию уровня пятиклассника и на скудную лексику. Будем выбирать жертву. И текстовые процессоры не спасут! Пора узнать, как звучат на родном языке: punctuation, diction faults и faulty idioms (((((((( |
|
link 22.06.2016 16:25 |
That was a joke. I'm not actually bloodthirsty today. |
А что, ГригСаныч у вас еще и поет? Эрику? После второй рюмки? Или Wenn die Soldaten? Или Айн хелля унт айн ба-а-цен? Лирик, млин. |
"у вас" - это он не у нас, а на французском форуме голосом хвалится и песенки постит, в том числе и Heino запостил я ему в ответ ссылку на свою любимую, даже под горячую руку текст перевела, но он не проникся :-( |
а если кваску хватанет, так и "Schwarze Augen" может. и под балалайку, и под гитару, и без аккомпанемента. |
|
link 22.06.2016 17:32 |
кас. 19:24 - хорошая инициатива. как-то здесь ржали над ляпами в англ нейтива гоголеск, было бы интересно понаблюдать за обратным раскладом. |
только со второго захода догадалась про "Айн хелля унт айн ба-а-цен" - ну и произношение :-) эту песню, кстати, в 19 веке студенты любили петь а что её потом вермахт снасильничал - так песня в этом не виновата |
Нейтив, шмейтив.. Wannabes you mean, ув. Эссбукетов. Гоголеск тот еще был экспонат. Gnaedige Frau, ну этож не.. My bad. I stand corrected. [’aɪ̯n 'hɛlɐ ’ʊnt ’aɪ̯n 'baːt͡sən]. Так лучшей? |
Second try: [ʔaɪ̯n 'hɛlɐ ʔʊnt ʔaɪ̯n 'baːtsən]. A так? |
|
link 22.06.2016 18:31 |
"тот еще был экспонат" - тут таких экспонатов -- каждый второй. |
да уж, походу каникулы в пту начались... у отдыхающих граждан сильно много свободного времени появилось... |
Взвод, на первый-второй рассчитайсь! Пришла пора выяснить, кто первый, кто второй! |
|
link 23.06.2016 6:05 |
Гоголеск |
Putin. |
You need to be logged in to post in the forum |