|
link 8.04.2020 11:31 |
|
Subject: .A’s liberty to X - say, to be free from being forcibly sodomized... Доброго времени суток! Не получается перевести данное предложения, поэтому прошу помощи. Буду очень благодарна за помощь. A’s liberty to X - say, to be free from being forcibly sodomized - simply takes away B’s liberty to sodomize A. B has, or may well have, no reason to respect the integrity of A’s body, save fear of consequences. Предложение в контексте выглядит так: Endowing each person with the MP liberty to inhabit a unique mental world leads, however, to a zero sum game. A’s liberty to X - say, to be free from being forcibly sodomized - simply takes away B’s liberty to sodomize A. B has, or may well have, no reason to respect the integrity of A’s body, save fear o f consequences. This impasse is structurally similar to that engineered by Hobbes, who thought that men had the most rights - and the largest liberty - in a state of nature. Взято из книги "The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence". |
| Свобода А на Х, допустим, свобода не быть подвергнутым гомосексуальному насилию, просто отбирает свободу Б совершать насилие над А. |
|
link 8.04.2020 13:29 |
| Спасибо большое! |
|
link 9.04.2020 4:27 |
| Свобода А в отношении Х |
| You need to be logged in to post in the forum |