|
Subject: A challenge would also require...to attack the reasoning of the Tribunal in an award law However, an appeal would have no chance of success, since Article 40(2) of the UNCITRAL Rules gives the arbitrators complete discretion in apportioning legal costs. In this case, the arbitrators exercised that discretion, and a Swedish court would not revisit the Tribunal’s decision. This is true notwithstanding the fact that the arbitrators did not explain their decision on this point further than to note that the Tribunal was exercising its discretion in light of the novelty of the issues raised. A challenge would also require [XXX] to attack the reasoning of the Tribunal in an award that is in all other respects extremely favourable to [XXX].В своей апелляции ХХХ должна будет оспорить аргументы (аргументацию) Арбитр. суда в решении, которое во всех других отношениях является крайне благоприятным для ХХХ...
|