|
Subject: routinize disruption with as little change to their work processes gen. Researchers need to build on a basic sociological insight-the fact that most news institutions try to routinize disruption with as little change to their work processes and ideological self-image as possible-and begin to ask how creative institutions work around these systemic and self-imposed constraints.... факт, что большинство новостных учреждений пытаться упростить нарушения с минимальным изменением своих рабочих процессов... |
|
не может быть, чтоб это disruptions не было раскрыто в контексте; не верю "нарушения" почти наверняка не в тему. и "упростить" толсто намекает, что текст вы скорее всего не поняли |
|
автор выкладывает текст по своей логике. Больше я disruptions в подобном контексте не встречал. Может дальше будет. Вот весь абзац: We also need to ask how traditional news organizations are reshaping their processes to adapt to a changing information environment. A forthcoming case study of the New York Times by Nikki Usher, an assistant professor at George Washington University, will hopefully go some distance toward answering this question, but we also need to start synthesizing the ways that creative news organizations are adapt- ing to the digital age. Researchers need to build on a basic sociological insight-the fact that most news institutions try to routinize disruption with as little change to their work processes and ideological self-image as possible-and begin to ask how creative institutions work around these systemic and self-imposed constraints. |
|
кину больше: A Story of Institutional Adaptation: The focus on decline and emergence also obscures a third story, one that may be, in the end, the most impor- tant of all. How do new entrants in the field of journalism ever get to the point where they can be said to have reached a point of organiza- tional stability? How do they move from being a precarious startup to a fully fledged member of the journalism community? As we will discuss below, one of the strengths of institutions lies in their ability to change personnel without risking their organizational extinction. How that happens, and how an emerging news organization becomes an institu- tion, is one of the central questions confronting journalism as it moves into the digital age. We also need to ask how traditional news organizations are reshap- ing their processes to adapt to a changing information environment. A forthcoming case study of the New York Times by Nikki Usher, an assistant professor at George Washington University, will hopefully go some distance toward answering this question, but we also need to start synthesizing the ways that creative news organizations are adapt- ing to the digital age. Researchers need to build on a basic sociological insight-the fact that most news institutions try to routinize disruption with as little change to their work processes and ideological self-image as possible-and begin to ask how creative institutions work around these systemic and self-imposed constraints. When it comes to news institutions, we're telling ourselves a lot of stories at once. While the stories of decline and rebirth make up the majority of discus- sion about the "future of news," there is a relative gap when it comes to under- standing the third story, that of institutional adaptation. Though the effect of the internet on the American journalism ecosystem has often been portrayed as anti-institutional, serving mainly to erode or even destroy institutional viability, its effect is actually more complex.While the internet has indeed disrupted many existing institutions, it has also helped usher in many new ones. Much of the fate of the news business will be decided not by what is going away, and not by what is exciting and new, but by how new institutions become old and stable and how old institutions become new and flexible. |
|
techy1> не может быть, чтоб это disruptions не было раскрыто в контексте; Feto> Больше я disruptions в подобном контексте не встречал. все бывает в первый раз ;) я бы думал что это disruptions - обобщающее слово. обобщающее какие-то частные явления или сущности из контекста. контекст ваш мне смотреть пока не получается, некогда - попробуйте сами |
|
В принципе ТэЧи думаю вы частично правы. Речь здесь идет об адаптации к информационной среде в изменяющемся цифровом мире. try to routinize disruption with as little change и все это для того чтобы показать какими креативнимы они моут быть в разных нестабильных ситуациях... |
| techy1 вы так это сказали как будто я жду чтобы вы для меня перевели ггг... Мне самому интересно где здесь истина кроется... |
|
понятно, что вы не ждали перевода. но вам ведь помощь нужна, чтоб со смыслом разобраться, правда:? детей уложу - прочитаю ;) |
|
" детей уложу"с одного удара (с ) уложите... |
|
хм... ничего не скажу. но убедили - без меня справитесь |
| причем в полусонном состоянии... |
| You need to be logged in to post in the forum |