mandatory indemnification

[lika F]

Существует ли фиксированное определение данного выражения? Принудительное возмещение расходов или обязательное освобождение от мат. ответственности за расходы? Спасибо!!

[alk]

http://www.lrc.ky.gov/krs/271B08/520.PDF
a corporation shall indemnify a director who was wholly successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he was a party because he is or was a director of the corporation against reasonable expenses incurred by him in connection with the proceeding

то есть корпорация директора защищает - см.
http://www.multitran.ru/c/m/shortf=1&fshort=1&s=expenses+incurred+by

http://www.lib.academy.sumy.ua/library/C_O_C\Issue%203,%20volume%201,%20Spring%202004.pdf
стр. 77-78
The existence of mandatory indemnification when the director has been successful has a straightforward explanation.
...
Since the directors govern the corporation, holding them liable will prevent them from engaging the corporation in illegal actions even if they are in the best interest of the corporation (Kraakman1985, Skyes, 1988). This explains why no indemnification is possible when the director has acted in bad faith. It also explains why indemnification is permissive in any other cases rather than mandatory.