| English | Russian |
| Computer security is a serious concern in today's technology-driven culture | Компьютерная безопасность представляет собой серьёзное беспокойство в сегодняшней технологически обусловленной культуре (ssn) |
| culture-correct resource | соответствующий культуре ресурс (ssn) |
| culture of libraries and tooling | набор библиотек и инструментальных средств (Alex_Odeychuk) |
| culture of safe working | культура безопасной работы (ssn) |
| culture provider | поставщик региональных стандартов (Alex_Odeychuk) |
| culture shifts | изменения в общей культуре (ssn) |
| culture-specific | локализованный (culture-specific resource – локализованный ресурс Alex_Odeychuk) |
| culture-specific resource | локализованный ресурс (Alex_Odeychuk) |
| current culture | текущие язык и региональные стандарты (Alex_Odeychuk) |
| current thread culture | региональные стандарты текущего потока (Alex_Odeychuk) |
| default culture | язык и региональные стандарты по умолчанию (Alex_Odeychuk) |
| parent culture | родительский язык и региональные параметры (Alex_Odeychuk) |
| project management culture | культура управления проектом (ssn) |
| refactoring culture | культура перепроектирования кода (Alex_Odeychuk) |
| rewrite culture | культура переписывания кода (Often, code isn't rewritten because it's inherently flawed. Instead, it's rewritten because developers have varying perspectives on what constitutes good or bad code. As a result, you might not always obtain better code; you simply get a different version of it. • It's essential to recognize that code quality is subjective. What one developer considers clean and efficient, another might view as convoluted. Before embarking on any refactoring or rewriting, it's crucial to have a clear objective in mind. Is the goal to improve performance, enhance readability, or accommodate new features? • Before approving any significant code rewrites, it's vital to weigh the benefits against the potential risks and costs. Will the rewrite introduce new bugs? Will it delay other critical features? A comprehensive code review process, combined with a well-defined coding standard within the team, can help mitigate unnecessary rewrites based on personal preferences. • It's imperative to consider the broader system architecture and long-term vision. A piece of code might seem suboptimal in isolation but could be integral to the system's overall design or future scalability. Any decision to rewrite should align with the system's architectural goals and the product's roadmap. • Code, like language, is a tool of expression for thoughts and ideas. Just as there are multiple ways to convey a thought or idea in language, there are numerous methods to implement a solution in code. The essence lies in the clarity of communication. The primary goal should be to ensure that the intended audience (be it other developers or a computer) can understand and interpret it effectively. Rewriting for the sake of personal preference without a clear functional or communicative benefit can be counterproductive. It's always essential to strike a balance between individual stylistic preferences and the team's overall understanding of the code and efficiency of the software system. Alex_Odeychuk) |
| software culture | культура программных разработок (ssn) |
| software-development culture | культура разработки программного обеспечения (Alex_Odeychuk) |
| technology-driven culture | технологически обусловленная культура (ssn) |
| the SDL has played a critical role in embedding security and privacy in software and culture of the adopting company | SDL сыграл важную роль во встраивании обеспечения безопасности и приватности в программные средства и культуру принимающей его компании (см. ISO/IEC 27034-1:2011 ssn) |
| today's technology-driven culture | сегодняшняя технологически обусловленная культура (ssn) |
| UI culture | язык и региональные стандарты пользовательского интерфейса приложения (Alex_Odeychuk) |
| user-selected culture | выбранные пользователем язык и региональные стандарты (Alex_Odeychuk) |
