сторонняя организация???

[Olia88]

Помогите с переводом фразы "привлечение сторонней организации"

engaging an external organisation?

Буду благодарна за помощь.

[Erdferkel]

https://www.multitran.com/m.exe?l1=1&l2=2&s=привлечение услуг сторонних организаций

[Amor 71]

outsourcing красиво, но надо бы контекст увидеть.

Если привлекают для того, чтобы вместо самой компании выполняли какую-то функцию, то да, подходит. Например, расформировывают собственную бухгалтерию и привлекают сторонюю компанию заняться их бухгалтерией. А если привлекают, чтобы вместе какую-то задачу решить или помочь в чем-то, то это уже не outsourcing.

А без контекста и engaging аn external organization подойдет, и involve, и bring in.

[Olia88]

Всем спасибо за ответы. А engaging a third-pary organization, может звучит лучше, чем external organization? Как считаете?

P.S. Да, аутсорсинг звучит красиво, но немного не то.

[Erdferkel]

ну раз так, попробуем как в немецком

https://www.multitran.com/m.exe?s=third+party&l1=1&l2=2

[paderin]

contract/subcontract third party

[Aiduza]

Оля, а вы у Влада спросите! :)

[Erdferkel]

м.б. это семейный подряд? :-)

[Freelancer_by]

Why not involvement of a third-party agency/company/business?

[Tamerlane]

third-party +1

[Amor 71]

///Why not involvement///

This is not English.

[Freelancer_by]

Why not?

[Amor 71]

Why not "involvement of a third-party agency/company/business"?

This is English

[Freelancer_by]

No, this is not. The correct one is: Why not use 'Involvement of a third-party agency/company/business?' The earlier one was informal English. It was not the Queen's English. Double quotation marks are used just for quoting someone. Besides, you should mind the right place of a quotation mark - after a punctuation mark, not in front of it like in Russian.

[Amor 71]

///Besides, you should mind the right place of a quotation mark - after a punctuation mark, not in front of it like in Russian.///

No kidding!

When the entire sentence—not just the quoted word or phrase—is a question, you’ll follow a different rule  In this case, the question mark is set OUTSIDE the quotation marks. Correct: Do you consider her note “noteworthy”?

Incorrect: Do you consider her note “noteworthy?” Correct: Should we sing “The Hairbrush Song”?

Incorrect: Should we sing “The Hairbrush Song?”

[Aiduza]

Amor 71, which one do you think is correct:

What did you mean when you asked “Should we sing “The Hairbrush Song”?”

Or 

What did you mean when you asked  “Should we sing “The Hairbrush Song”?”?

Ответ очевиден. :) Просто вас не в ту степь занесло.

[Amor 71]

I guess we were talking about the phrase Why not "involvement of a third-party agency/company/business"?

What is wrong with it?

Any problem?