Without Prejudice - basis. gen.

[jahana]

Please note that this letter is issued on a - Without Prejudice - basis.

Примите к сведению, что данное письмо составлено без ущерба каким-либо существующим правам.

[x-z]

Помню как какая-то падла в американском посольстве поставила на моей визе 'cancelled without prejudice'. Типо, без обид, парниша.

)

[Евгений Тамарченко]

я бы убрал "существующие", потому что права могут возникнуть и позже.

И лучше не "составлено", а "направлено".

[x-z]

В английском подразумевается "отослать" кому-либо. А в русском лучше будет в данном контексте именно "составлено", имхо. Если в полном контексте факт отправки не особо акцентируется.

[Winwin4all]

Без предубеждений и значит что повторно тоже откажут.r that has been fully heard before. Often a court will enter a judgment with prejudice if the plaintiff has shown bad faith, misled the court, or persisted in filing frivolous lawsuits.

[toast2]

в юридической переписке сторон оговорка "without prejudice" означает, что (например, предложение) делается без права противной стороны впоследствии, в случае возникновения спора, ссылаться на него, в частности, в ходе судебных разбирательств

[NC1]

Without prejudice -- это ситуация, когда к вопросу можно вернуться в будущем. With prejudice -- это когда вопрос решен окончательно и более подниматься не должен.

[fayzee]

Definition, Policy and Extent of ‘Without Prejudice’ Protection

‘Without prejudice’ means ‘without prejudice to the maker of the statement’.

In most, if not all, common law countries, what this means is that negotiations by parties and letters sent to each other labelled ‘without prejudice’ are privileged, inadmissible as evidence and should not be considered by the judge or arbitrator for deciding the factual issues.

They can be disclosed during the proceedings only if both parties consent to their disclosure and are admissible either when there is a waiver by the maker or if the communication falls into the several categories of exceptions (both of these aspects will be covered later in this article).

In Singapore, s 23 of the Evidence Act (‘Act’) (Cap 97), states: ‘In civil cases, no admission is relevant if it is made either upon express condition that evidence of it is not to be given, or under circumstances from which the court can infer that the parties agreed together that evidence of it should not be given’.

The policy of the courts and legislation in common law countries in recognising the ‘without prejudice’ rule is to encourage parties engaged in disputes to try to settle their disputes as far as possible without resorting to litigation. Conversely, the parties should not be discouraged in genuine attempts at peaceful resolution by any trepidation that their communications during negotiations may be used to their prejudice in due course during legal proceedings.
http://www.lawgazette.com.sg/2003-10/Oct03-feature2.htm

[toast2]

фейзи нагуглил правильно.
nc1 немного ошибается.