 |
|
link 16.09.2011 5:45 |
|
Subject: Include but are not limited to food.ind. Too awkward? or will do?. ..these include, but are not limited to, such features as ... |
|
link 16.09.2011 5:58 |
|
not clear explain please what you mean |
|
link 16.09.2011 6:00 |
| Да, все хорошо, вполне распространенная формулировка =) |
| why not use a standard 'including but not limited to'? |
|
link 16.09.2011 6:04 |
| including without limitation |
|
link 16.09.2011 6:30 |
|
thank you. Serge1985: The standard 'including but not limited to' is good, but complicates the already complicated syntax... Too lazy. Thanks |
| see ya point |
| You need to be logged in to post in the forum |