|
The second element of the Schine rationale-depriving antitrust defendants ‘of the benefits of their conspiracy’-is equally well established.United States v. Crescent Amusement Co., 323 U.S. 173, 65 S.Ct. 254, 89 L.Ed. 160, was a Sherman Act suit in which certain motion picture exhibitors were found to have used their combined buying power to obtain terms more favorable than those received by their independent competitors in licensing films, whereby independents were driven from the field and a monopoly in theater operation developed in many towns - контекст - касательно антимонопольного процесса кинопрокатные компании?
|
